The CCHIT commission responsible for certifying EMRs held two town hall conference calls to unveil their proposed modifications to the certification process to better handle open source solutions as well as modular and in-house built solutions. The proposal was well-received
“In real-time polling conducted during both sessions, 70 percent of respondents expressed a very favorable or favorable reaction to the plan.”, from a CCHIT email dated 6/18/2009.
and I agree that the proposed modifications will make the certification process much more friendly to the open source community and open the door to a host of solutions being certified. There was also discussion of the meaningful use guidelines that were released the same day.
The original vendor certification will continue and be updated to include the meaningful use criteria that was pushed forward last week (here). There are two new certifications and they are EHR-M and EHR-S. EHR-M or Module allows components of a complete solution to be certified. This allows medication management vendors or lab system to certify their solution without it being a full EMR. I am most interested in this type of certification as eHIP is not a full EMR but incorporates many components. I can see individually certifying components within the overall platform. EHR-S or site certification allows a hospital or physician’s office to self-certify an open source product they have implemented or software that was developed in house. This is also intriguing because I can easily imagine one of our client’s applying for this certification using eHIP.
Two factors that differentiate the original certification and the new ones are cost and emphasis. Costs for EHR-M and EHR-S are planned to be significantly lower than the existing certification which is a barrier to many open source solutions. The EHR-S cost might be as low as a few hundred dollars per provider. While this is important, the emphasis will also be different. The traditional EMR certification has concentrated on and while continue to concentrate on functionality. Can the EMR do X, Y, and Z as well as 1,2, and 3? With EMR-M and S, the emphasis will be on interoperability, a much more important factor.
I think the original EMR certification has had the potential to stifle innovation. With the rules constantly changing, vendors have had to keep up with the new requirements, limiting their ability to add new, more innovative features. I think the new proposed guidelines open the door to new possibilities and I look forward to seeing what eventually is implemented.